Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only TheMiddleMarket.com can deliver.
  • Mergers & Acquisitions Daily and M&A Financing Report, our free email news alerts
  • Expert M&A and Private Equity Blogs
  • Industry White Papers

Women Are From Venus, M&A Is From Mars

If you’re in M&M, er, M&A, now you may know what it feels like to be a kid in a candy store.

One deal does not make a trend, of course, but Monday’s announcement that Mars and Berkshire Hathaway were teaming up to buy gum-maker Wrigley had to tickle the taste buds of a comatose buyout crowd desperate for signs of life.

Now, there’s usually very little connection between “$23 billion” or “Berkshire Hathaway” and “middle market,” but chew on this: If the big guys can snap out of their sour state, it just might be possible for the mid-market to walk away from the credit imbroglio entirely unscathed.

Don’t snicker. While it’s true that middle-market (and even more so, lower middle-market) deals have continued to get done throughout the credit downturn, a drought in activity among bigger players isn’t palatable. There are any number of reasons for this, other than that you don’t necessarily want to be competing with Goldman for your next deal.

As I talk with bankers, the less I hear about a tie up in the credit markets and the more I hear about the growing impact of a slowing global economy. For the middle-market crowd, where financing was always less of an issue, this could be a particularly thorny issue. Only time will tell how gnarly this recession will be, but it’s safe to say that Warren Buffett’s Berkshire isn’t in the business of paying 28% premiums for consumer discretionary-type companies at the start of an extended economic pullback. (Buffett will own a bit more than 10% of Wrigley.)

There’s also the issue of valuation. The buy values Wrigley at about 20x Ebitda, “extremely rich,” according to one analyst. Nothing wrong with a little froth to spice up a dreary market, even if some of Buffett’s detractors might be singing, “Sometimes you feel like a nut…” for the next few days.

And, there’s hope evident in how the deal was financed. Yes, there’s a good chance it wouldn’t have happened at all if not for Buffett and his $6 billion-plus contribution, but a shade more than $17 billion of the total price came from JPMorgan and Goldman, harkening back to the good old days of 2007, when getting financing was like taking candy from a baby.

Pretty sweet.

Recent Posts

In Defense of Canada

I'm not quite sure why, but there's been a lot of Canada bashing lately.

Scale for the Sake of Scale

Are boards and compensation committees unwittingly incentivizing empire-building among CEOs?

Are Club Deals Back?

The SkillSoft buyout seems to reflect the coziness that probably concerns regulators about consortiums.

Rollups are Back

Middle market firms never really discarded the strategy, but the mega firms, specifically KKR and Blackstone, are turning to rollups as a way to put money to work.

Index of Posts

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Money Management Executive, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.