Ken MacFadyen

Mr. MacFadyen is the editor of Mergers & Acquisitions Journal. Prior to joining the magazine, Mr. MacFadyen served as managing editor of Investment Dealers Digest and Buyouts Magazine.

He received his bachelor of arts in English from the University of New Hampshire (Phi Beta Kappa).

Ken can be reached at ken.macfadyen@sourcemedia.com.


Sign up today and take advantage of member-only content — the kind of timely, cutting edge industry insight that only TheMiddleMarket.com can deliver.
  • Mergers & Acquisitions Daily and M&A Financing Report, our free email news alerts
  • Expert M&A and Private Equity Blogs
  • Industry White Papers

MacFadyen: Blame Leverage

Reuters’ Matthew Goldstein last week trotted out a commentary calling on regulators to “take the L out of LBO.” He began his <a href="  http://blogs.reuters.com/commentaries/2009/08/31/take-the-l-out-of-lbo/">blog</a>, stating: “In a perfect world, we would simply ban leveraged buyouts,” and within a few paragraphs proposed rules capping leverage to 50% of the purchase price.

I initially thought I knew where Goldstein was going, but he took a leap I didn’t really expect.

Let's take it a step further, and imagine for a minute a world without any leverage at all. Gone are the bankruptcies and the painful cost-cutting many have come to associate with leverage. But we're left without any real growth. We're effectively living in a world without leverage right now, and capital expenditures are being put off, job growth has gone in reverse, and salaries are getting ratcheted lower. Also, nobody wants to sell, because valuations are so low. That means assets wallow as either a division of some larger parent company or in the hands of an entrepreneur who is only thinking about retirement or his or her next big idea.

I've written about the idea of <a href="/maj/20070801/32217-1.html">sustainable borrowing</a> in the past, and I agree with a good portion of Goldstein's argument. That being said, the unintended consequences of his proposal would be much worse than the solution it provides. It's the old "eradicate the mosquitoes" solution that doesn't consider its role in the food chain.

Goldstein, himself, jumped to Thomson Reuters from BusinessWeek. The former took on $7 billion-plus in debt to complete the Thomson/Reuters merger, while the latter -- owned by McGraw Hill -- is hoping that someone will save assets and keep the magazine in print. BusinessWeek's blog reported that private equity firms Platinum Equity, ZelnickMedia, OpenGate Capital and Warburg Pincus are among those showing interest.

Recent Posts

The New Activists

GPs probably knew a shift was coming, but it's unlikely they foresaw limiteds taking more of an activist approach. Unfortunately, for sponsors, that seems to be the direction LPs are taking.

In Defense of Canada

I'm not quite sure why, but there's been a lot of Canada bashing lately.

Scale for the Sake of Scale

Are boards and compensation committees unwittingly incentivizing empire-building among CEOs?

Are Club Deals Back?

The SkillSoft buyout seems to reflect the coziness that probably concerns regulators about consortiums.

Index of Posts

0 Comments

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments...

Already Registered?

If you have already registered to Money Management Executive, please use the form below to login. When completed you will immeditely be directed to post a comment.

Forgot your password?

Not Registered?

You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.